Absolute Existence Philosophy
A Logical Framework for Understanding Reality
Free to read · No account · Open inquiry
A Logical Framework for Understanding Reality
Free to read · No account · Open inquiry
Introduction of the method and the starting point for the Philosophy of Absolute Existence.
An invitation to reflect on an alternative assumption within the philosophical conceptual framework.
A deeper exploration of the philosophical framework and its foundational reasoning.
The philosophical lineage from classical thought to the Absolute Existence Philosophy.
How Occam's Razor leads to the simplest possible starting point for philosophy.
The logical structure connecting Existence, Essence and Phenomenon.
How creation myths arise and how they correspond to reality
Common questions and clarifications about the philosophy.
An examination of the Organic Unity View in relation to Absolute Existence Philosophy.
Exploring the concept of wholeness and its significance.
Independent essays exploring aspects of existence and consciousness.
Testing the concepts and their ordering within the philosophy and the thinking of reality
Distinguishing between evidence and self-evidence in philosophical reasoning.
An overview of the logical coherence of the philosophy.
Tracing the development of metaphysics from physics to Absolute Existence.
Comparing non-duality traditions with the Absolute Existence Philosophy.
Addressing the common misunderstanding about indifference.
The journey from dream-like assumptions to genuine philosophical insight.
Examining the philosophical grounds upon which decisions are made.
Comparing general AI responses with the Absolute Existence Philosophy assumption.
A reasoning with AI on a philosophical reflection.
An attempt to sense what the text in the 'New Testament' points to.
On empty loneliness and the alternative found in Absolute Existence.
The Ontological Oscillation
The question of Existence is essential — it concerns the very foundation of all being. The solution, however, is phenomenal: it manifests as an expression that can be experienced, interpreted, and communicated. In other words, it is a phenomenal solution to the essential question of Existence.
The absolute starting point is not a choice, but a logical necessity to: speak of Existence without dependence, distinguish Essence from Phenomenon, and avoid introducing parts or relations into the Absolute. All alternative starting points lead to dependence, relativity, and phenomenological confusion.
'We' is a phenomenal concept and has no place in Absolute Existence, since everything there is one and undivided. In the Phenomenon, however, 'we' can experience and share the Faculty of Perception, which constitutes the very Essence of Absolute Existence.
'Being' is Existence itself — unchanging and unconditional. 'That which is' refers to phenomena, objects, or events — that which appears within Being's Essence is relative, changeable, and dependent. Absolute philosophy strictly distinguishes these to preserve logical clarity.
No. Origo cannot be understood as nothing or non-existence, as this would make the foundation relative and conditional. Origo is necessarily Absolute Existence — the unchanging Being. It is a something to which thought can attach, not merely an empty position in nothingness.